Further into the book juror number 8 and 10 get into it over the case again. This time it is over the fact that the old man could possibly be lying about "getting to the door in 15 seconds." It didn't make sense how an old man who could barely get to the stand with help from the security guards. Juror 8 reenacts the whole scene from the old man hearing the body hit the floor to him openingup the door to see the kid running. The time comes out to 39 seconds which is way off of the time the old man said even though he swore under oath. The jurors take another vote now the votes are 6 to 6. This frustrates juror 3 and he claims they aren't the right jurors for the job. They take a vote asking if they are or aren't right and the vote was 7 to 5. The case continues and the arguments never stop.
Sunday, May 15, 2016
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
12 angry men (continued)
In this part of the story the jurors decided to take another vote, but the juror that said not guilty will not be a part of the vote this time. They all take another vote and surprisingly one of the other jurors changes their mind. Of course, all of the other jurors are furious about this and question why he changes his vote. The juror comes up with this very clever senario that the old man (neighbor down stairs) would not have been able to hear the boy say "I'm going to kill you" if the El train was passing by at the same time. Personally I think that he's right, but the other jurors decide to be close minded and deny the fact that he could be right. The jurors just want to go on and get home, but the two opposing jurors are preventing them from doing so. Since this is happening the other 9 jurors are denying everything the two jurors are saying and sticking with their original decision (guilty). This is really messed up because we're talking about a young man's life right now and they are trying to ruin it just because they want to go home. The worst part about it is those 9 jurors can care less.
Tuesday, May 3, 2016
12 angry men
In the story 12 angry men they are arguing about whether or not a young man is guilty or not of murdering his father. The facts line up which is why personally I think he is guilty. He bought a pocket knife the same day his father was killed, there was a witness, and the neighbor heard the whole incident. They (the jurors) spent the whole time arguing about whether or not he was guilty except for one who truly believes that the kid is innocent. He grew up in a tough place and was basically getting abused all his life. He believes in the saying innocent until proven guilty which is causing a whole problem with all the other jurors. I haven't read any further in the book but I'm pretty sure there are a lot more arguments ahead waiting for me to read up on.
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
We all Belong
In the story "The Stolen Party" it shows the problem how people are judged on how much money they make, and not accepted. I took this story to heart because i can connect on not being accepted based on where you come from, and what you have rather who you are inside. As a kid i may not have a lot of money to offer but i had a lot inside me that was worth more than anyones money. People are so caught up in material things that they forget about whats important who your are. They forget that what you have don't make you no better than anyone else. The better clothes you put on don't make you better than next man or women. So how can anyone tell someone they do not belong, how can a person separate them self because of their money. I would not want to go out somewhere to have everyone looking down on me because the color of my skin making me not belong. How can we all be created equal but people live life against that. The money you make do not determine the person you are, so do not judge. Do not judge me before you get to know me because you would be surprised. How do you feel about judging a book by its cover? When have you played a part in judging someone, and how do you feel about that?
gender roles
![]() |
| BRING HOME THE BACON |


